The problem with too much email
There is a particular kind of frustration that comes from opening your inbox at the end of a busy working day and seeing that the number of unread messages has somehow increased rather than decreased.
You have worked all day. You have answered questions, attended meetings, made decisions and dealt with things that could not wait. Yet there they are: dozens of messages still waiting for you. Fifty. A hundred. Perhaps more.
The obvious conclusion is that you receive too much email.
It is an understandable conclusion. Email has become one of the main ways work enters our day, and the volume can be relentless. New messages arrive while you are dealing with the previous ones. Someone needs an answer. Someone sends an attachment. Someone copies you into a conversation. A newsletter appears. A colleague follows up on something you have not had time to deal with. Before you know it, your inbox has become a running record of everything that still needs your attention.
But there is a problem with seeing the amount of email as the problem.
I used to think the same way.
More than fifteen years ago, I moved from working as a group leader with teenagers into an office role as a business information manager. One of the biggest changes was not the work itself, but the amount of email that suddenly filled my days.
At the end of the day, I would sometimes have fifty or a hundred unread messages sitting in my inbox. They were not all useless. Quite the opposite. Many were well-intentioned and relevant. But the sheer number of them created a feeling that the working day was never really finished. I was working hard, yet I still felt as though I was trying to catch up.
Eventually, I realised that the problem was not simply the amount of email I received.
It was what my inbox had become.
An inbox is not a to-do list
Email creates a peculiar problem because one message can represent very different things.
It can be information you need to read. A question you need to answer. A decision you need to make. A task someone has given you. A document you need to review. Something you need to remember. Something you might need later. Or something that requires no action from you at all.
Yet all of these things arrive in exactly the same place.
The inbox does not tell you what a message means. It simply tells you that a message exists.
This seems harmless until the inbox becomes large enough. Then you have to repeatedly interpret the same information. You open a message and ask yourself what to do with it. You leave it there because you need to remember it. You mark it unread because you have not dealt with it yet. You search for an older message because you know it contains something important. You scan the list again because you cannot quite remember whether you already dealt with something.
The inbox gradually stops being a place where new information arrives and becomes a place where unfinished business is stored.
That is a different problem.
The number of messages is visible, but the real cost is less obvious. You are spending part of your attention trying to understand the state of your own work.
This is why simply answering more email does not necessarily make the problem disappear. If every message that requires further attention remains in the same place, dealing with one message does little to clarify the rest. You have reduced the number temporarily, but you have not changed the system.
The hidden work inside an inbox
An overloaded inbox creates work that does not look like work.
Searching is one example.
You remember that someone sent you something last week. You know roughly who sent it and perhaps what it was about, but not exactly when. So you search. You open a few messages. You discover another conversation. You follow that thread. You realise the information you need was actually in an attachment.
None of this appears on your task list.
Yet it consumes time.
The same thing happens when you repeatedly scan your inbox to decide what deserves attention. You may not answer anything during that scan, but you are still processing information. You are reconstructing priorities from a collection of messages that was never designed to represent your workload.
There is another problem. Leaving something in your inbox because you are afraid of forgetting it feels like a sensible solution. The message is visible, so you assume it will remain available as a reminder.
But visibility is not the same as control.
When there are ten messages in your inbox, a message can act as a reminder. When there are fifty, a hundred or several hundred, each additional message competes with the others. The thing you deliberately kept there so you would not forget it becomes part of the background noise.
The irony is that an inbox can become less useful as a reminder precisely because you are using it as a reminder for everything.
Click the image to get your copy of the E-book now ➝
Email creates a problem of interpretation
This is where the problem becomes more interesting.
The difficulty with email is not only that there is too much information. It is that the information arrives without a clear place in the way you work.
Consider a simple message:
“Could you take a look at this and let me know what you think?”
That sentence could mean five minutes of work, an hour of work, a conversation with someone else, or a decision that requires information you do not yet have.
The email itself does not tell you where the work belongs.
So you keep the message in your inbox while you work out what to do with it.
Multiply that by dozens of messages and the inbox becomes a mixture of communication, reminders, tasks, reference material and unfinished decisions.
That mixture is what makes a large inbox difficult to manage.
The problem is therefore not solved simply by becoming faster at reading.
It requires a clearer way of deciding what each message represents and where it belongs once you have understood it.
The temptation to organise everything
When an inbox becomes unmanageable, the natural response is to create more structure.
Folders appear.
Rules are created. Messages are colour-coded. Labels are added. Old messages are archived into increasingly specific categories. Sometimes an elaborate system develops with folders for projects, clients, departments, subjects and years.
There is nothing inherently wrong with organisation. The problem starts when organising email becomes another job.
A system that requires you to think carefully about where every message should go can create more work than it removes.
The useful question is not, “How can I organise my email better?”
It is, “What does this message need from me, if anything, and where should it go so I do not have to keep thinking about it?”
That question changes the purpose of your inbox.
Instead of treating the inbox as the place where your work lives, you begin treating it as the place where work arrives.
Those are very different things.
The inbox as a temporary place
A physical mailbox provides a useful analogy.
When you collect your post, you do not normally expect the mailbox to become your permanent filing system, task list and archive. You take the letters out and decide what happens next.
Some are dealt with immediately. Some require action later. Some are information. Some can be discarded. Some need to be kept.
The mailbox itself is not responsible for managing all of those things.
Email is no different in principle.
The inbox is simply the point of arrival.
Once you see it that way, the objective changes. You are no longer trying to keep an inbox that contains everything you have not yet forgotten. You are trying to give every message a clear destination.
That destination might be an action you need to take, something you are waiting for, information you want to keep, or nothing at all.
The specific method is less important than the underlying principle: a message should not remain in your inbox simply because you have not decided what else to do with it.
What changes when the inbox has a purpose
This was the change I eventually made in my own work.
I stopped trying to make my inbox a complete representation of everything that was happening around me. Instead, I developed a simple way of deciding what each message meant and what should happen to it.
The result was not fewer emails.
I still received plenty of them.
What changed was the amount of uncertainty surrounding them.
I could see what needed attention. I could separate things that required action from things I was simply keeping for reference. I no longer had to use unread messages as a memory system. Searching became less of a daily necessity because information had a clearer place.
The calm did not come from reducing the volume.
It came from reducing the ambiguity.
That is an important difference because you cannot always control how much email other people send you. You can unsubscribe from some messages. You can reduce unnecessary notifications. You can improve communication habits within a team. All of those things help.
But there will still be email.
People will still ask questions. Projects will still generate conversations. Documents will still arrive. Someone will still send a message with “quick question” in the subject line that turns out to be anything but quick.
Trying to solve the problem entirely by reducing incoming email therefore puts the solution somewhere you have limited control.
Giving incoming email a clear destination puts more of the solution back in your hands.
The real goal is not an empty inbox
There is a tendency to treat an empty inbox as the ultimate goal.
It is easy to understand why. An empty inbox looks clean. It provides a satisfying sense of completion. There is nothing left staring back at you.
But an empty inbox does not necessarily mean your work is under control.
You could process every message and still have twenty unfinished tasks sitting elsewhere. You could archive everything and still have no idea what you need to do tomorrow morning.
The purpose of managing email is therefore not to achieve a particular number of messages.
It is to make the state of your work understandable.
That difference is important because it removes some of the unnecessary pressure around email. You do not have to win a daily battle against the inbox. You need a reliable way of knowing what each message means and what, if anything, you need to do about it.
Once that is in place, an inbox with several messages can be perfectly manageable.
An empty inbox without that clarity can be almost meaningless.
The question to ask
The question is not whether you have too much email.
Ask what your inbox is currently being asked to do.
Is it a communication channel?
A reminder system?
A task list?
A filing cabinet?
A place to store things you might need later?
A record of unfinished work?
If the answer is “all of them”, the number of emails is probably not the only problem.
The system itself is carrying too much responsibility.
That is why I wrote The Purpose-Driven Inbox (https://rubenopstal.nl/product/the-purpose-driven-inbox-e-book/). The book grew out of the practical problem I encountered when my own inbox became a place where everything accumulated. The solution was not a complicated productivity system. It was a simple approach to giving email a clear purpose and a clear destination.
The underlying idea is straightforward: your inbox should help you work. It should not become another piece of unfinished work that you have to manage.
That sounds like a small change.
In practice, it fundamentally changes the relationship you have with email.
When email stops competing for your attention
You are probably never going to reach the point where email disappears from your working life.
That is not the short-term objective anyway.
The more useful goal is to reach a point where opening your inbox does not immediately create another layer of uncertainty.
You know what belongs there. You know what does not. You know where unfinished work goes. You know where useful information belongs. And you no longer need to keep dozens of messages visible simply because you are afraid that otherwise you will forget them.
The volume of email may remain exactly the same.
Your experience of that volume does not have to.
An inbox is a small part of your working life, but it sits at an important point: right where other people’s questions, requests, information and priorities enter your day. If that point is unclear, the confusion spreads into the rest of your work.
If it has a clear purpose, the opposite happens.
Email becomes ordinary again.
And ordinary is probably the right ambition for a tool that was never supposed to run your working day.